Automated Author ProfileDaniel K. Rosenberg
Daniel K. Rosenberg
Current S-Index
Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets
Average Dataset Index per Dataset
Average Dataset Index per dataset
Total Datasets
Total datasets for this author
Average FAIR Score
Average FAIR Score per dataset
Total Citations
Total citations to the author's datasets
Total Mentions
Total mentions of the author's datasets
S-Index Interpretation
The S-Index (Sharing Index) is a comprehensive metric that represents the cumulative impact of all your datasets. It is calculated as the sum of Dataset Index scores across all your claimed datasets.
What it means:
- A higher S-index indicates greater overall impact of your datasets relative to typical datasets in their fields of research
- The S-Index grows as you add more datasets or as existing datasets gain more citations and mentions
- It provides a single number to track your research data impact over time
Current S-Index: 1.5 (sum of 1 dataset Dataset Index scores)
More information here.
S-Index Over Time
Cumulative Citations Over Time
Cumulative Mentions Over Time
Datasets
Studies of habitat selection can reveal important patterns to guide habitat restoration and management for species of conservation concern. Giant gartersnakes (Thamnophis gigas) are endemic to the Central Valley of California, where more than 90% of their historic wetland habitat has been converted to agricultural and other uses. Information about the selection of habitats by individual giant gartersnakes is needed to guide habitat restoration. We examined selection of microhabitats and vegetation types by adult female giant gartersnakes with radio telemetry at a site comprised of rice agriculture and restored wetlands using a paired case-control study design. Adult female giant gartersnakes were 15.6 (10.124.7) times more likely to be active (foraging, mating, or moving) when located in aquatic habitats than when located in terrestrial habitats. Microhabitats associated with cover, particularly emergent vegetation, terrestrial vegetation, and litter, were positively selected by giant gartersnakes. Individual giant gartersnakes varied greatly in their selection of rice and rock habitats, but little in their selection of open water. Tules (Schoenoplectus acutus) were the most strongly selected vegetation type, and duckweed (Lemna spp.), water-primrose (Ludwigia spp.), forbs, and grasses also were positively selected at the levels of availability observed at our study site. Management practices that promote the interface of water with emergent aquatic and herbaceous terrestrial vegetation will likely benefit giant gartersnakes. Restoration of native tule marshes will likely provide the greatest benefit to these threatened aquatic snakes.
Authors
- Brian J Halstead ;
- Patricia Valcarcel ;
- Glenn D. Wylie ;
- Peter S Coates ;
- Michael L Casazza ;
- Daniel K. Rosenberg