Automated Author ProfileWyatt, Hayley
Wyatt, Hayley
Current S-Index
Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets
Average Dataset Index per Dataset
Average Dataset Index per dataset
Total Datasets
Total datasets for this author
Average FAIR Score
Average FAIR Score per dataset
Total Citations
Total citations to the author's datasets
Total Mentions
Total mentions of the author's datasets
S-Index Interpretation
The S-Index (Sharing Index) is a comprehensive metric that represents the cumulative impact of all your datasets. It is calculated as the sum of Dataset Index scores across all your claimed datasets.
What it means:
- A higher S-index indicates greater overall impact of your datasets relative to typical datasets in their fields of research
- The S-Index grows as you add more datasets or as existing datasets gain more citations and mentions
- It provides a single number to track your research data impact over time
Current S-Index: 2.5 (sum of 8 datasets Dataset Index scores)
More information here.
S-Index Over Time
Cumulative Citations Over Time
Cumulative Mentions Over Time
Datasets
Summary of all data presented within the paper to create the figures.
Authors
- Wyatt, Hayley ;
- Safar, Alexander ;
- Clarke, Alastair ;
- Evans, Sam L. ;
- L. Angela Mihai
Additional material generated as part of the manuscript revision process
Authors
- Wyatt, Hayley ;
- Safar, Alexander ;
- Clarke, Alastair ;
- Evans, Sam L. ;
- L. Angela Mihai
Additional material generated as part of the manuscript revision process
Authors
- Wyatt, Hayley ;
- Safar, Alexander ;
- Clarke, Alastair ;
- Evans, Sam L. ;
- L. Angela Mihai
Summary of all data presented within the paper to create the figures.
Authors
- Wyatt, Hayley ;
- Safar, Alexander ;
- Clarke, Alastair ;
- Evans, Sam L. ;
- L. Angela Mihai
A comparison between model (continuous line) and simulation (dashed line) of the effective elastic modulus. The cell-core is 10 times softer than the cell walls for structure 1, 20 times softer than the cell walls for structure 2, and 100 times softer than the walls for structure 3. The closed cubical cells and their inclusions are shown at 20% (right) tension in the vertical direction (colour bar showing the displacement in the same direction).
Authors
- L. Angela Mihai ;
- Wyatt, Hayley ;
- Goriely, Alain
A comparison between model (continuous line) and simulation (dashed line) of the effective elastic modulus. The cell-core is 10 times softer than the cell walls for structure 1, 20 times softer than the cell walls for structure 2, and 100 times softer than the walls for structure 3. The closed cubical cells and their inclusions are shown at 20% (right) tension in the vertical direction (colour bar showing the displacement in the same direction).
Authors
- L. Angela Mihai ;
- Wyatt, Hayley ;
- Goriely, Alain
A comparison between model (continuous line) and simulation (dashed line) of the effective elastic modulus. The cell-core is 10 times softer than the cell walls for structure 1, 20 times softer than the cell walls for structure 2, and 100 times softer than the walls for structure 3. The closed hexagonal prismatic cells and their inclusions are shown at 20% (right) tension in the vertical direction (colour bar showing the displacement in the same direction) is shown.
Authors
- L. Angela Mihai ;
- Wyatt, Hayley ;
- Goriely, Alain
A comparison between model (continuous line) and simulation (dashed line) of the effective elastic modulus. The cell-core is 10 times softer than the cell walls for structure 1, 20 times softer than the cell walls for structure 2, and 100 times softer than the walls for structure 3. The closed hexagonal prismatic cells and their inclusions are shown at 20% (right) tension in the vertical direction (colour bar showing the displacement in the same direction) is shown.
Authors
- L. Angela Mihai ;
- Wyatt, Hayley ;
- Goriely, Alain