Automated Author ProfileKelly, Joan
Kelly, Joan
Current S-Index
Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets
Average Dataset Index per Dataset
Average Dataset Index per dataset
Total Datasets
Total datasets for this author
Average FAIR Score
Average FAIR Score per dataset
Total Citations
Total citations to the author's datasets
Total Mentions
Total mentions of the author's datasets
S-Index Interpretation
The S-Index (Sharing Index) is a comprehensive metric that represents the cumulative impact of all your datasets. It is calculated as the sum of Dataset Index scores across all your claimed datasets.
What it means:
- A higher S-index indicates greater overall impact of your datasets relative to typical datasets in their fields of research
- The S-Index grows as you add more datasets or as existing datasets gain more citations and mentions
- It provides a single number to track your research data impact over time
Current S-Index: 48.6 (sum of 39 datasets Dataset Index scores)
More information here.
S-Index Over Time
Cumulative Citations Over Time
Cumulative Mentions Over Time
Datasets
To explore health professionals’ acceptance of the guidelines for acute whiplash associated disorders (WAD), and to identify barriers and facilitators to adherence. Qualitative descriptive study involving focus group discussions among health professionals who treat people with WAD in primary and secondary care settings in New South Wales and Queensland, Australia. Twenty-eight health professionals (physiotherapists = 19; chiropractors = 6; osteopaths = 3) participated in six semi-structured focus group discussions that were held in independent offices in Sydney and Brisbane, Australia between September and December 2015. Discussions were audio recorded and verbatim, de-identified transcripts produced. Thematic analysis was conducted using an inductive approach to identify commonly held beliefs. Acceptance of guideline recommendations appeared to be influenced by factors related to the guideline itself, practitioner and practice characteristics, and patient-related factors. Specifically, acceptance was hindered by conflicting belief systems, ambiguity in guideline recommendations, and patient characteristics and expectations. Practitioners demonstrated a positive attitude towards the use of the guidelines in general; however, in some cases, acceptance of key recommendations appeared selective. Future guideline revision and implementation might focus on explaining the underlying principles of the guidelines, providing more detailed recommendations, and involving strategies that challenge inconsistent beliefs and promote informed decision-making. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONSelective acceptance of guideline recommendations in favour of those not requiring practice change may present a challenge for the implementation of evidence-based practice in the management of whiplash.Participants demonstrated variable, sometimes polar attitudes to guideline key messages and recommendations.Guideline developers need to focus more strongly on changing practitioner beliefs and attitudes, as well as better explaining the underlying principles of the guidelines, and providing more detailed recommendations. Selective acceptance of guideline recommendations in favour of those not requiring practice change may present a challenge for the implementation of evidence-based practice in the management of whiplash. Participants demonstrated variable, sometimes polar attitudes to guideline key messages and recommendations. Guideline developers need to focus more strongly on changing practitioner beliefs and attitudes, as well as better explaining the underlying principles of the guidelines, and providing more detailed recommendations.
Authors
- Bandong, Aila Nica ;
- Rebbeck, Trudy ;
- Mackey, Martin ;
- Sterling, Michele ;
- Kelly, Joan ;
- Ritchie, Carrie ;
- Leaver, Andrew
To explore health professionals’ acceptance of the guidelines for acute whiplash associated disorders (WAD), and to identify barriers and facilitators to adherence. Qualitative descriptive study involving focus group discussions among health professionals who treat people with WAD in primary and secondary care settings in New South Wales and Queensland, Australia. Twenty-eight health professionals (physiotherapists = 19; chiropractors = 6; osteopaths = 3) participated in six semi-structured focus group discussions that were held in independent offices in Sydney and Brisbane, Australia between September and December 2015. Discussions were audio recorded and verbatim, de-identified transcripts produced. Thematic analysis was conducted using an inductive approach to identify commonly held beliefs. Acceptance of guideline recommendations appeared to be influenced by factors related to the guideline itself, practitioner and practice characteristics, and patient-related factors. Specifically, acceptance was hindered by conflicting belief systems, ambiguity in guideline recommendations, and patient characteristics and expectations. Practitioners demonstrated a positive attitude towards the use of the guidelines in general; however, in some cases, acceptance of key recommendations appeared selective. Future guideline revision and implementation might focus on explaining the underlying principles of the guidelines, providing more detailed recommendations, and involving strategies that challenge inconsistent beliefs and promote informed decision-making. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONSelective acceptance of guideline recommendations in favour of those not requiring practice change may present a challenge for the implementation of evidence-based practice in the management of whiplash.Participants demonstrated variable, sometimes polar attitudes to guideline key messages and recommendations.Guideline developers need to focus more strongly on changing practitioner beliefs and attitudes, as well as better explaining the underlying principles of the guidelines, and providing more detailed recommendations. Selective acceptance of guideline recommendations in favour of those not requiring practice change may present a challenge for the implementation of evidence-based practice in the management of whiplash. Participants demonstrated variable, sometimes polar attitudes to guideline key messages and recommendations. Guideline developers need to focus more strongly on changing practitioner beliefs and attitudes, as well as better explaining the underlying principles of the guidelines, and providing more detailed recommendations.
Authors
- Bandong, Aila Nica ;
- Rebbeck, Trudy ;
- Mackey, Martin ;
- Sterling, Michele ;
- Kelly, Joan ;
- Ritchie, Carrie ;
- Leaver, Andrew
Story collected by Joan Kelly, a student at Lanesboro school (Lanesborough, Co. Longford) from informant Miss Brigid Murphy.
Authors
- Reachtagáin, E. Ó ;
- Kelly, Joan ;
- Murphy, Miss Brigid
Story collected by Joan Kelly, a student at An Clochar, Dún an Ochta school (Eyrecourt, Co. Galway) from informant Mrs Kelly.
Authors
- Kostka, ;
- Kelly, Joan ;
- Kelly, Mrs
Story collected by Joan Kelly, a student at Lanesboro school (Lanesborough, Co. Longford) (no informant identified).
Authors
- Reachtagáin, E. Ó ;
- Kelly, Joan
Story collected by Joan Kelly, a student at Lanesboro school (Lanesborough, Co. Longford) from informant Miss Mary Murphy.
Authors
- Reachtagáin, E. Ó ;
- Kelly, Joan ;
- Murphy, Miss Mary
Story collected by Joan Kelly, a student at An Clochar, Dún an Ochta school (Eyrecourt, Co. Galway) from informant Mrs Kelly.
Authors
- Kostka, ;
- Kelly, Joan ;
- Kelly, Mrs
Story collected by Joan Kelly, a student at An Clochar, Dún an Ochta school (Eyrecourt, Co. Galway) (no informant identified).
Authors
- Kostka, ;
- Kelly, Joan
Story collected by Joan Kelly, a student at Dalkey (Loreto Convent) school (Dalkey, Co. Dublin) from informant Mr Kelly.
Authors
- Evangeline, Mother ;
- Kelly, Joan ;
- Kelly, Mr
Story collected by Joan Kelly, a student at Lanesboro school (Lanesborough, Co. Longford) from informant Miss Mary Murphy.
Authors
- Reachtagáin, E. Ó ;
- Kelly, Joan ;
- Murphy, Miss Mary