Automated Author ProfileKaarbo, Juliet
University of Edinburgh
Kaarbo, Juliet
Current S-Index
Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets
Average Dataset Index per Dataset
Average Dataset Index per dataset
Total Datasets
Total datasets for this author
Average FAIR Score
Average FAIR Score per dataset
Total Citations
Total citations to the author's datasets
Total Mentions
Total mentions of the author's datasets
S-Index Interpretation
The S-Index (Sharing Index) is a comprehensive metric that represents the cumulative impact of all your datasets. It is calculated as the sum of Dataset Index scores across all your claimed datasets.
What it means:
- A higher S-index indicates greater overall impact of your datasets relative to typical datasets in their fields of research
- The S-Index grows as you add more datasets or as existing datasets gain more citations and mentions
- It provides a single number to track your research data impact over time
Current S-Index: 3.8 (sum of 3 datasets Dataset Index scores)
More information here.
S-Index Over Time
Cumulative Citations Over Time
Cumulative Mentions Over Time
Datasets
The International Treaty Ratification Votes Database (ITRVD) includes data on 6,010 parliamentary votes on the ratification of international treaties for the period between 1990 and 2019 in Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Slovakia, Spain, Turkey, the United Kingdom, and the USA.
Authors
- Ostermann, Falk ;
- Böller, Florian ;
- Herranz-Surrallés, Anna ;
- Kaarbo, Juliet ;
- Lagassé, Philippe ;
- Martill, Benjamin ;
- Onderco, Michal ;
- Raunio, Tapio ;
- Terzi, Özlem ;
- Vignoli, Valerio ;
- Wagner, Wolfgang
The Parliamentary Deployment Votes Database (PDVD) includes data on parliamentary votes on the deployment of armed forces. Version 3 of the dataset (V3, July 2021) contains data on 1,022 votes in plenaries and 5,540 party votes for the period between August 1990 and December 2019 in Australia, Belgium, Canada, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Romania, Slovakia, South Korea, Spain, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States of America.The data consists of two separate datasets, one on parliamentary-level votes (PDVD_v3_votes) and one on party votes (PDVD_v3_party-votes) with accompanying documentation.
Authors
- Ostermann, Falk ;
- Baciu, Cornelia ;
- Böller, Florian ;
- Čepo, Dario ;
- Christiansen, Flemming J. ;
- Coticchia, Fabrizio ;
- Fonck, Daan ;
- Herranz-Surrallés, Anna ;
- Kaarbo, Juliet ;
- Kim, Joo Hee ;
- Kučmáš, Kryštof ;
- Lagassé, Philippe ;
- Martill, Benjamin ;
- McDonagh, Kenneth ;
- Onderco, Michal ;
- Pedersen, Rasmus B. ;
- Raunio, Tapio ;
- Reykers, Yf ;
- Sonneveld, Richard ;
- Smetana, Michal ;
- Tago, Atsushi ;
- Terzi, Özlem ;
- Trainauskiene, Sigita ;
- Vignoli, Valerio ;
- Wagner, Wolfgang
Why do multiparty cabinets in parliamentary democracies produce more extreme foreign policies than single-party cabinets? Our paper argues that particular institutional and psychological dynamics explain this difference. We test this argument using a global events data set incorporating foreign policy behaviors of numerous multiparty and single-party governments. We find that more parties and weak parliaments promote extremity in coalitions, but parliamentary strength has the opposite effect for single-party governments. This study challenges existing expectations about the impact of democratic institutions on foreign policy.
Authors
- Beasley, Ryan K. ;
- Kaarbo, Juliet