Chest x-ray in the COVID-19 pandemic: Radiologists real-world reader performance.

View Dataset
Cozzi, Andrea;Schiaffino, Simone;Arpaia, Francesco;Pepa, Gianmarco Della;Tritella, Stefania;Bertolotti, Pietro;Menicagli, Laura;Monaco, Cristian Giuseppe;Carbonaro, Luca Alessandro;Spairani, Riccardo;Paskeh, Bijan Babaei;Sardanelli, Francesco

Description

Dataset from the article Cozzi A, Schiaffino S, Arpaia F, Della Pepa G, Tritella S, Bertolotti P, Menicagli L, Monaco CG, Carbonaro LA, Spairani R, Babaei Paskeh B, Sardanelli F. Chest x-ray in the COVID-19 pandemic: Radiologists' real-world reader performance. Eur J Radiol. 2020 Nov;132:109272. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109272. Epub 2020 Sep 10. PMID: 32971326; PMCID: PMC7481070. Abstract Purpose: To report real-world diagnostic performance of chest x-ray (CXR) readings during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: In this retrospective observational study we enrolled all patients presenting to the emergency department of a Milan-based university hospital from February 24th to April 8th 2020 who underwent nasopharyngeal swab for reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and anteroposterior bedside CXR within 12 h. A composite reference standard combining RT-PCR results with phone-call-based anamnesis was obtained. Radiologists were grouped by CXR reading experience (Group-1, >10 years; Group-2, <10 years), diagnostic performance indexes were calculated for each radiologist and for the two groups. Results: Group-1 read 435 CXRs (77.0 % disease prevalence): sensitivity was 89.0 %, specificity 66.0 %, accuracy 83.7 %. Group-2 read 100 CXRs (73.0 % prevalence): sensitivity was 89.0 %, specificity 40.7 %, accuracy 76.0 %. During the first half of the outbreak (195 CXRs, 66.7 % disease prevalence), overall sensitivity was 80.8 %, specificity 67.7 %, accuracy 76.4 %, Group-1 sensitivity being similar to Group-2 (80.6 % versus 81.5 %, respectively) but higher specificity (74.0 % versus 46.7 %) and accuracy (78.4 % versus 69.0 %). During the second half (340 CXRs, 81.8 % prevalence), overall sensitivity increased to 92.8 %, specificity dropped to 53.2 %, accuracy increased to 85.6 %, this pattern mirrored in both groups, with decreased specificity (Group-1, 58.0 %; Group-2, 33.3 %) but increased sensitivity (92.7 % and 93.5 %) and accuracy (86.5 % and 81.0 %, respectively). Conclusions: Real-world CXR diagnostic performance during the COVID-19 pandemic showed overall high sensitivity with higher specificity for more experienced radiologists. The increase in accuracy over time strengthens CXR role as a first line examination in suspected COVID-19 patients.

Citations (0)

Mentions (0)

Metrics

Dataset Index

0.3

FAIR Score

54%

Citations

0

Mentions

0

Metrics Over Time

Publication Details

DOI

Publisher

Zenodo

License

Restricted Access

Assigned Domain

Subfield

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

Field

Medicine

Domain

Health Sciences

Confidence Score

100%

Source

Open Alex

Keywords

COVID-19PneumoniaviralRadiographythoracicSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

Normalization Factors

FT

57.69

CTw

1.00

MTw

1.00