Site is currently under maintenance
Some features may be unavailable or limited during this time. We apologize for any inconvenience and appreciate your patience.

Published on 24 September 2021

FEATURES OF UKRAINIAN STUDENTS` VERBAL REPRESENTATION OF THE GENDER INEQUALITY`S CONCEPT

View Dataset
Tetiana, Kostina;Diana, Drozdova;Iryna, Bulakh

Description

The study aimed to determine Ukrainian students' verbal representation of the gender inequality's concept. Verbal representations were obtained based on the use of a directed associative experiment. The study involved 309 students (199 females and 110 males) from 17 to 25 years. Gender analysis showed: women provided 539 reactions, including 530 verbal (176 originals) reactions and nine rejections; men provided 319 reactions: 310 verbal reactions (103 original) and nine rejections. The most frequent reactions to the stimulus “gender inequality" were revealed: жінка / woman (10,6%), чоловік / man (9,4%), фемінізм / feminism (4,3%), несправедливість / injustice (3,7%), права / rights (2,9%), нерівність / inequality (2,8%), стать / gender (2,7%), сексизм / sexism (2,4%), дискримінація / discrimination (2,3%), насильство / violence (2%). It was determined that the concept of "gender inequality" has a negative connotation among Ukrainian students. Cognitive interpretation of the data showed that the concept has a more negative emotional connotation for women than for men. For a significant number of women, gender inequality includes experiences associated with sexism, discrimination, and violence. Analysis of male associations has shown that men's concept has a less emotional response and is presented at a more abstract (theoretical) level.

Citations (0)

Mentions (0)

Metrics

Dataset Index

1.9

FAIR Score

77%

Citations

0

Mentions

0

Metrics Over Time

Publication Details

DOI

Publisher

Zenodo

Assigned Domain

Subfield

Information Systems

Field

Computer Science

Domain

Physical Sciences

Confidence Score

84%

Source

Open Alex

Keywords

conceptgender inequalitydirected associative experimentstudentscognitive interpretation

Normalization Factors

FT

13.46

CTw

1.00

MTw

1.00