AGILE: Candidate specific trial protocol 2 (CST2): EIDD-2801 (molnupiravir) Primary Analysis
View DatasetDescription
AGILE: Seamless Phase I/IIa Platform for the Rapid Evaluation of Candidates for COVID-19 treatment. (UoL001542B)The antiviral drug molnupiravir was licensed for treating at-risk patients with COVID-19 on the basis of data from unvaccinated adults. The randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 2 trial (AGILE CST-2) aimed to evaluate the safety and virological efficacy of molnupiravir in vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals with COVID-19. The primary outcome was the time from randomisation to SARS-CoV-2 PCR negativity on nasopharyngeal swabs, analysed by use of a Bayesian Cox proportional hazards model for estimating the probability of a superior virological response (hazard ratio [HR]>1) for molnupiravir versus placebo. This trial is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04746183), and the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN27106947).We undertook a dose-escalating, open-label, randomized-controlled (standard-of-care) Bayesian adaptive Phase I trial to evaluate the safety and optimal dose of molnupiravir in patients with early symptomatic infection. -d-N4-hydroxycytidine (NHC), the parent nucleoside of molnupiravir, a COVID-19 antiviral, was quantified at SARS-CoV-2 transmission sites in 12 patients enrolled in AGILE Candidate-Specific Trial-2. Saliva, nasal, and tear NHC concentrations were 3%, 21%, and 22% that of plasma. Molnupiravir induces lethal error catastrophe in SARS-CoV-2. How this drug-induced mechanism of action might impact the emergence of resistance mutations is unclear. To investigate this, we used samples from the AGILE CST-2. We describe the pre-specified exploratory virological endpoint of CST-2, to determine the possible genomic changes in SARS-CoV-2 induced by molnupiravir treatment.
Citations (0)
No citations found
Mentions (0)
No mentions found
Metrics Over Time
Publication Details
DOI
Publisher
University of Liverpool
Subfield
Statistics and Probability
Field
Mathematics
Domain
Physical Sciences
Confidence Score
50%
Source
Scholar Data Model