Supplementary Material for: Prognostic ability of nutritional indices for outcomes of bladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

H., Jiao;L., Wang;X., Zhou;J., Wu;T., Li

Description

Background: Nutrition has become an important parameter influencing the prognosis of several cancers. However, its impact on outcomes of bladder cancer (BC) is still unclear. This review examines the association between three commonly used nutritional indices namely, the prognostic nutritional index (PNI), controlling nutritional status (CONUT), and the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) and outcomes of BC. Methods: PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar were explored for studies published up to 13th April 2023. Data from studies were pooled to examine the association between PNI, CONUT, or GNRI and overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Results: Thirteen studies were included. Meta-analysis demonstrated significantly poor OS with low PNI vs high PNI in BC patients (HR: 1.71 95% CI: 1.37, 2.14 I2=0%). This result remained significant in various subgroup analyses. However, no association was noted between PNI and RFS (HR: 1.22 95% CI: 0.67, 2.24 I2=84%). Meta-analysis showed that patients with high CONUT scores had significantly poor OS (HR: 2.43 95% CI: 1.82, 3.25 I2=0%) as well as RFS (HR: 2.90 95% CI: 2.10, 4.01 I2=0%). Data on GNRI was scarce and conflicting. Conclusion: Limited data shows that PNI and CONUT are predictive of outcomes in BC. Low PNI was associated with poor OS while high CONUT was associated with poor OS and RFS. Data on GNRI is too scarce to obtain conclusions. Further studies are needed to supplement the results.

Citations (0)

Mentions (0)

Metrics

Dataset Index

0.8

FAIR Score

85%

Citations

1

Mentions

0

Metrics Over Time

Publication Details

DOI

Publisher

Karger Publishers

License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Assigned Domain

Subfield

Cancer Research

Field

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Domain

Life Sciences

Confidence Score

97%

Source

Open Alex

Keywords

Medicine

Normalization Factors

FT

57.69

CTw

1.00

MTw

1.00