Fountain Trust 12. General Synod of the Church of England, Consultation on Charismatic Renewal, 1979-1981
View DatasetDescription
[description english/roman)] General Synod of the Church of England, Consultation on Charismatic Renewal, 1979-1981 [88 pages]. Includes: correspondence (Michael Harper to W.D. Pattinson, 1979 Aug. 13 (p. 2), W.D. Pattinson to Michael Harper (1979 May (p. 3), 1979 Aug. 10 (p. 4)), Pattinson (1979 Aug. 10 (p. 12), [s.d.] (p. 21), [s.d.] (p. 63)), Michael Harper to Pattinson, 1980 Jan. 2 (p. 64), Rex Davis, [1979?] (p. 72), David Gregg, [s.d.] (p. 77), David Gregg to Michael Harper, 1981 Apr. 3 (p. 80)); synod participants list, 1979 Oct. 9-10 (p. 5); memorandum, W.D. Pattinson, 1979 May 21; synod program booklet (pp. 8-9); synod program, 1979 Oct. 9-10 (pp. 10-11); report on the value of charismatic renewal & list of participants, 1978 Dec. 6-7 (pp. 13-20); paper I "A factual presentation of the history of the present movement within the Church of England and a survey of its present extent", John Richards (pp. 22-32); paper II "An impressionistic view of the influence of the charismatic renewal in the life of the Church of England", John Gunstone, 1979 July (pp. 33-45); paper III "Questions raised for the historic churches by the advent of the charismatic movement", David Russell, 1979 Aug. (pp. 46-52); paper IV "Psychological aspects of the charismatic renewal movement", W.H. Allchin, 1979 Aug. (pp. 53-59); synod program, 1979 Oct. 9-10 (pp. 60-61); synod discussion groups (p. 62); synod report, David Gregg, 1979 Nov. 16 (pp. 65-71); eport on General Synod Consultation on Charismatic renewal, Rex Davis, 1979 Oct. 9-10 (pp. 73-76); notes of Working Group on charismatic renewal, David Gregg, 1980 Easter (pp. 78-79); article Emmanuel Sullivan "Can the Pentecostal movement renew the churches?" in SE = Study encounter 8/4 (1972): [1-16] (pp. 81-88).
Citations (0)
No citations found
Mentions (0)
No mentions found
Metrics Over Time
Publication Details
Subfield
History
Field
Arts and Humanities
Domain
Social Sciences
Confidence Score
25%
Source
Scholar Data Model