Version 1

Kathmandu Valley Single Hazards and Multi-Hazard Interrelationships Database

View Dataset
Thompson, Harriet E.;Gill, Joel C.;Šakić Trogrlić, Robert;Taylor, Faith E.;Malamud, Bruce D.

Description

This Kathmandu Valley Single Hazards and Multi-Hazard Interrelationships Database uses a systematic review of blended evidence types (academic literature, grey literature, media, databases, and social media) to compile single hazard and multi-hazard interrelationship exemplars of natural hazards in the context of Kathmandu Valley.We identify 58 sources of evidence for single hazard types and 21 sources of evidence for multi-hazard interrelationships. These sources evidence 21 single hazard types across six hazard groups, and 83 multi-hazard interrelationships that could influence Kathmandu Valley. Of these multi-hazard interrelationships, 12 have direct case study evidence of previous influence in Kathmandu Valley.This Excel database accompanies the paper Thompson et al. (2024).The Kathmandu Valley Single Hazards and Multi-Hazard Interrelationships Database comprises the following sheets:          A. Single Hazards Evidence            B. Hazard Interrelationships Evidence            C. Hazard Interrelationships Matrix            D. Matrix Evidence            E. Definitions (Source Types)            F. Definitions (Hazards)            G. Definitions (Interrelationships)            H. References  In Sheet A, each row in the database describes a separate source of evidence of a single hazard influencing Kathmandu Valley. In each column, we describe the evidence using the qualifiers outlined below:Hazard typeSource information and linkSource contentHazard interrelationships and anthropogenic processesVideo evidenceSource reflectionsMajor event typical frequency reflectionAny other reflection on a single hazardImpactIn Sheet B, each row in the database describes a separate source of evidence of a multi-hazard interrelationship influencing Kathmandu Valley. In each column, we describe the evidence using the qualifiers outlined below:Hazard typeSource information and linkSource contentHazard sequenceSource reflectionsImpactInput from practitioner stakeholdersInput from practitioner stakeholders - prioritisationWe refer the reader to Thompson et al. (2024) for details of the methodology used to populate this database.ReferencesThompson, H. E., Gill, J. C., Šakić Trogrlić, R., Taylor, F. E., and Malamud, B. D.: A methodology to compile multi-hazard interrelationships in a data-scarce setting: an application to Kathmandu Valley, Nepal, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2024-101, in review, 2024.

Citations (2)

Mentions (0)

Metrics

Dataset Index

1.1

FAIR Score

79%

Citations

2

Mentions

0

Metrics Over Time

Publication Details

DOI

Publisher

Zenodo

Assigned Domain

Subfield

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Field

Environmental Science

Domain

Physical Sciences

Confidence Score

58%

Source

Scholar Data Model

Keywords

hazardsmulti-hazardsmulti-hazard interrelationshipsKathmandu Valleyriskearthquakevolcanic eruptionlandslideflooddroughtregional subsidenceground collapsesoil subsidenceground heavestormfogtornadohailstormsnowstormlightningextreme temperature (heat)extreme temperature (cold)wildfireurban firegeomagnetic stormimpact eventrisk scenariosNepal

Normalization Factors

FT

13.46

CTw

1.00

MTw

1.00