Version 1.0

Replication Data for: Does School Debating Reduce Vulnerability to Misinformation? A Field Experiment in Poland

View Dataset
Krakowski, Krzysztof;Clemm von Hohenberg, Bernhard;Morisi, Davide

Description

The idea that debating enhances political knowledge and critical thinking has been entertained by scholars of democracy for a long time. Given recent concern about a crisis of misinformation, we explore the idea that debating makes people less vulnerable to misinformation and conspiracy thinking. In a field experiment, we recruited high-school students in 18 schools in Poland (n=430) and assigned them to either a debating workshop or a control condition. Before and after the workshop period, we asked students to indicate their belief in a set of news headlines (half of which were true, half false) and also measured their degree of conspiratorial thinking. We find that debating increases, by a small amount, the accuracy of beliefs regarding news headlines, while reducing conspiracy thinking. These findings point to a great potential of school debating, which occurs naturally in many educational contexts and is easily scalable.

Citations (0)

Mentions (0)

Metrics

Dataset Index

0.1

FAIR Score

15%

Citations

0

Mentions

0

Metrics Over Time

Publication Details

DOI

Publisher

Harvard Dataverse

License

Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal

Assigned Domain

Subfield

Artificial Intelligence

Field

Computer Science

Domain

Physical Sciences

Confidence Score

48%

Source

Scholar Data Model

Keywords

Social SciencesMisinformationConspiracy thinkingFake newsDebatingCritical thinking

Normalization Factors

FT

57.69

CTw

1.00

MTw

1.00