Version 1

Data from: Applications of random forest feature selection for fine-scale genetic population assignment

Sylvester, Emma V.A.;Bentzen, Paul;Bradbury, Ian R.;Clément, Marie;Pearce, Jon;Horne, John;Beiko, Robert G.;Sylvester, Emma V. A.

Description

Genetic population assignment used to inform wildlife management and conservation efforts requires panels of highly informative genetic markers and sensitive assignment tests. We explored the utility of machine-learning algorithms (random forest, regularized random forest, and guided regularized random forest) compared with FST ranking for selection of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) for fine-scale population assignment. We applied these methods to an unpublished SNP dataset for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and a published SNP data set for Alaskan Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). In each species, we identified the minimum panel size required to obtain a self-assignment accuracy of at least 90% using each method to create panels of 50-700 markers Panels of SNPs identified using random forest-based methods performed up to 7.8 and 11.2 percentage points better than FST-selected panels of similar size for the Atlantic salmon and Chinook salmon data, respectively. Self-assignment accuracy ≥90% was obtained with panels of 670 and 384 SNPs for each dataset, respectively, a level of accuracy never reached for these species using FST-selected panels. Our results demonstrate a role for machine-learning approaches in marker selection across large genomic datasets to improve assignment for management and conservation of exploited populations.

Citations (0)

Mentions (0)

Metrics

Dataset Index

1.1

FAIR Score

77%

Citations

2

Mentions

0

Metrics Over Time

Publication Details

DOI

Publisher

Dryad

License

Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal

Assigned Domain

Subfield

Statistics and Probability

Field

Mathematics

Domain

Physical Sciences

Confidence Score

36%

Source

Scholar Data Model

Keywords

Salmo salarSNP SelectionIndividual Assignment

Normalization Factors

FT

57.69

CTw

1.00

MTw

1.00