Published on 03 August 2018 |
Data from: C:N:P stoichiometry in China's forests: from organs to ecosystems
View DatasetDescription
Ecological stoichiometry connects different levels of biology, from the gene to the globe, by scaling up elemental ratios (e.g., carbon [C], nitrogen [N], and phosphorus [P]). Thus, ecological stoichiometry could be a powerful tool for revealing certain physiological processes of plants. However, C:N:P stoichiometry remains unclear at the community and ecosystem level, despite it being potentially important for primary productivity. In this study, we measured the C, N, and P content of different plant organs, litter, and soil in 9 natural forest ecosystems (cold-temperate to tropical forests along a 3700-km transect in China) to explore C:N:P stoichiometry and the main influencing factors. C:N:P stoichiometry was evaluated for different components in the forest ecosystems (plant community, soil, litter, and ecosystem) and, at the community level, for different organs (leaves, branches, trunks, and roots) from 803 plant species. The ratios of C:P and N:P decreased with increasing latitude, with spatial patterns being primarily regulated by climate. Interestingly, the homeostasis of N, P, and N:P was highest in leaves, followed by branches, roots, and trunk, supporting the hypothesis that more active organs have a higher capacity to maintain relatively stable element content and ratios. At the community level, the leaf N:P ratio indicated increasing P limitation in forests of lower latitude (i.e., more southerly) in China's forests. Our findings demonstrate the spatial patterns of C:N:P stoichiometry and the strategies of element distribution among different organs in a plant community, providing important data on C:N:P to improve the parameterization of future ecological models.
Citations (1)
- https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12979DataCite MDC OpenAlex
Cited on 25 September 2017
Weight: 1.00
Mentions (0)
No mentions found
Metrics Over Time
Publication Details
Subfield
Education
Field
Social Sciences
Domain
Social Sciences
Confidence Score
55%
Source
Scholar Data Model