Site is currently under maintenance
Some features may be unavailable or limited during this time. We apologize for any inconvenience and appreciate your patience.

Published on 13 September 2023

TABLE 1. Diagnostic characters between C in A new overlooked species and a new record of Cyrtopodium (Cymbidieae, Orchidaceae) from Uruguay

View Dataset
Batista, João A. N.;González, Andrés;Cruz-Lustre, Gabriela

Description

TABLE 1. Diagnostic characters between C. izaguirreae and similar species.C. brandonianumC. izaguirreaeC. kleiniiC. lageanumC. pallidumLeaf development at anthesispartial to fully developedpartial to fully developedpartial to fully developedlittle to partially developedpartial to fully developedMature leafs length × width (cm)(24–)41–60(–81) × (0.7–)1–1.5(–2.1)10–40 × 0.9–2.28.5–24 × 0.5– 1.7(–2.2)11–43 × 0.3–0.927–63 × 0.7–1.6Mature leafs length/width ratio24 to 767 to 3818 to 2728 to 6120 to 59Inflorescence no ramifications0(–1)(0–)1–30(–1)0(–1)0(–1)Sepals length × width (mm)12–19 × (8–)10–148–12 × 4.5–6(8–)9–12 × (4–)6– 7(–8.5)12–17 × (6–)9–12(8–)9–12(–13) × 6–9Petals length × width (mm)15–17 × 11–138.5–10 × 6.5–7.09.5–12 × (6–)7–812–17 × (6–)9–12(8–)9–12(–13) × 6–9Lip width between apex ofthe lateral lobes when spread (mm)19–22(–24)10–12(9–)10–12(14–)17–2014–19Lip lateral lobes length × width (mm)(4–)6–8 × 4–67–8 × 2–2.53–4 × (2.5–)3– 3.5(–4)5–7 × (2.5–)3– 3.5(–4)(5–)6–7(–9) × 3–5.5Lip lateral lobes colourpinkish-purple to purplepinkishredpinkishpinkishLip midlobe length × width (mm)8–13 × 14–215–6 × 7–83.5–5 × (4–)5–6(6–)9–11 × (9–)11–14(5–)6–8(–9) × (5–)7–10Lip midlobe colourpinkish-purple to purplepinkishyellowpinkishpinkishLip midlobe base constriction (isthmus) length (mm)absent or inconspicuous 0–1(–2)conspicuous 1–1.5absent or inconspicuous 0(–1.5)conspicuous (1–)2–3conspicuous 2–3

Citations (2)

Mentions (0)

Metrics

Dataset Index

0.8

FAIR Score

13%

Citations

2

Mentions

0

Metrics Over Time

Publication Details

DOI

Publisher

Zenodo

Assigned Domain

Subfield

Plant Science

Field

Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Domain

Life Sciences

Confidence Score

22%

Source

Scholar Data Model

Keywords

BiodiversityTaxonomy

Normalization Factors

FT

30.77

CTw

1.00

MTw

1.00