Description
This paper explores a paradox that emerges when attempting to define a set of ”mathematically insignificant” natural numbers. We demonstrate that classifying a number as insignificant by including it in such a set inadvertently grants it significance, leading to a contradiction reminiscent of Russell’s paradox. The implications extend to the philosophy of mathematics, challenging how we define and perceive mathematical objects.
Citations (0)
No citations found
It looks like this dataset has no citations.
Mentions (0)
No mentions found
It looks like this dataset has not been mentioned in any sources.
Metrics Over Time
Publication Details
Subfield
Theoretical Computer Science
Field
Mathematics
Domain
Physical Sciences
Confidence Score
51%
Source
Scholar Data Model
Keywords
LogicMathematical logic, set theory, lattices and universal algebra