Site is currently under maintenance
Some features may be unavailable or limited during this time. We apologize for any inconvenience and appreciate your patience.

Published on 01 January 2017

ANALYSIS OF ISOSTATICALLY-BALANCED CORTICAL MODELS USING MODERN GLOBAL GEOPOTENTIAL MODELS

View Dataset
Infante, Claudia;Tocho, Claudia;Cogliano, Daniel Del

Description

Abstract: The knowledge of the Earth's gravity field and its temporal variations is the main goal of the dedicated gravity field missions CHAMP, GRACE and GOCE. Since then, several global geopotential models (GGMs) have been released. This paper uses geoid heights derived from global geopotential models to analyze the cortical features of the Tandilia structure which is assumed to be in isostatic equilibrium. The geoid heights are suitably filtered so that the structure becomes apparent as a residual geoid height. Assuming that the geological structure is in isostatic equilibrium, the residual geoid height can be assimilated and compared to the isostatic geoid height generated from an isostatically compensated crust. The residual geoid height was obtained from the EGM2008 and the EIGEN-6C4 global geopotential models, respectively. The isostatic geoid was computed using the cortical parameters from the global crustal models GEMMA and CRUST 1.0 and from local parameters determined in the area under study. The obtained results make it clear that the isostatic geoid height might become appropriate to validate crustal models if the structures analyzed show evidence of being in isostatic equilibrium.

Citations (0)

Mentions (0)

Metrics

Dataset Index

1.8

FAIR Score

81%

Citations

0

Mentions

0

Metrics Over Time

Publication Details

DOI

Publisher

SciELO journals

Assigned Domain

Subfield

Geophysics

Field

Earth and Planetary Sciences

Domain

Physical Sciences

Confidence Score

58%

Source

Scholar Data Model

Keywords

GeochemistryFOS: Earth and related environmental sciences90905 Photogrammetry and Remote SensingFOS: Environmental engineering

Normalization Factors

FT

15.38

CTw

1.00

MTw

1.00