Table 5 in Electrophoretic delineation of species boundaries within the genus Chelodina (Testudines: Chelidae) of Australia, New Guinea and Indonesia

Table 5. Parental allele frequencies and hybrid genotypes at the 21 loci where the percentage difference between any two parental taxa is greater than 50%. Each of the two alleles displayed by a hybrid animal is indicated with a cross (+). Parental profiles for Clo and Cno have largely been taken from the overview study (Table 2; data for Hb from Stage 2) whereas those for Cru (combining the NT and Qld populations) and Cbu (NT populations only) were obtained from the Stage 2 analyses. None of the 24 loci not presented show genotypes inconsistent with a hybrid origin. An asterisk indicates that the presence of the null allele Acyc f has been assumed, given the observed electrophoretic phenotype (the same mobility as allozyme e but a much-reduced activity). Superscripts are used to indicate which loci are diagnostic for the various parental taxa: A Clo vs. Cno; B Cno vs. Cru; C Cru vs. Cbu (or effectively diagnostic if Cru is also represented by the NT populations only). (na = genotype was not determined)Locus alleleParentClo XClo XParentCno XCno XParentCru XParentCloCnoCnoCnoCru(Cno X Cru)CruCbuCbuAcon1f+195e10d100+ ++ +90++ +79+5b+90a2Acyc Bf100+ ++ +100+*+*e++382c44+93b42a14+3Ada A,Bh4g++95+ +100d1c100++b+18a+82++Alb Bh5+g100+ ++ +95+d++100na100Ca1 B,Ce7d+8c+87+3b93+ ++ +100++4+97a1Ca2 Bc19+b++81+100a100+ ++ +100++Csc57+4b43+ ++100+ ++ +96na100Est A,Bc93+++100na100b++100++ +a7G6pdb+91a100+ ++ +100+ ++ +100+9Hb Ad19+83c100++1217b2a++100+ ++ +67+Idhc+54+62+5b100++ +32+ +38+95a14+Lap Bb+100na100a100+ ++ +100++ +Ldh1 Be14d100+ ++ +86++ +c+100na100Mdh1 Bc+100na95b100+ ++ +100++ +a5Me1d+93+ +98c12b21+ ++ +100++ +6a79Me2 Bd1c+99+ +100b100++ +100++ +a+Np Bh4g++100+ +100f86++14+d32b14++41a9+PepA Bi2h7813g7f+e+13+ +87c100++ +9b91++ +Pgm1d1c719+98+ +98b29+ ++ +91++ +a12Pk Bb7++100na100a93+ ++ +100++Xo Bc+100+ +92a100+ ++ +100++ +8