Version 1st Edition

Electing John Bull: the Changing Face of British Elections, 1895-1935

View Dataset
Good, K.;Lawrence, J.

Description

The project studied eleven randomly chosen English constituencies at four General Elections (1895, January 1910, 1922 and 1935). Using the local press and other surviving political sources, the project generated a series of database tables. <br> <br> Principal aims and objectives:<br> 1. Establish a clearer chronology for the changing character of electoral politics between 1895 and 1935.<br> 2. Establish a clearer understanding of changing attitudes towards elections and public involvement in politics among politicians and commentators on the one hand, and the general public on the other.<br> 3. Construct a series of database tables on electioneering practices which will become a valuable source for historians interested in understanding social and political change during Britain's rapid emergence as a full democracy between the 1890s and the 1930s.<br> 4. Demonstrate that the proposed new methodology can be developed to study elections on a broader scale - i.e. to earlier and later elections, to non-English constituencies, and perhaps also to intervening elections (e.g. 1900, 1906, 1918, 1924, 1931 etc.).<br> <br> Key findings included: <br> 1) A dramatic shift away from disruption in public politics after 1918<br> 2) A purely temporary increase in women’s involvement in public politics in the early twentieth century – this had been reversed by the 1930s<br> 3) A dramatic streamlining of political meetings in the 1930s<br> 4) A shift away from other ‘frivolous’ forms of political campaigning after 1918<br> 5) The continued importance of the meeting to electioneering throughout the inter-war period<br>

Citations (0)

Mentions (0)

Metrics

Dataset Index

0.2

FAIR Score

31%

Citations

0

Mentions

0

Metrics Over Time

Publication Details

DOI

Publisher

UK Data Service

Assigned Domain

Subfield

Political Science and International Relations

Field

Social Sciences

Domain

Social Sciences

Confidence Score

49%

Source

Scholar Data Model

Normalization Factors

FT

42.31

CTw

1.00

MTw

1.00