Published on 21 March 2013 |

Version 1

Data from: Temporal analysis of the honey bee microbiome reveals four novel viruses and seasonal prevalence of known viruses, Nosema, and Crithidia.

View Dataset
Runckel, Charles;Flenniken, Michelle L.;Engel, Juan C.;Ruby, J. Graham;Ganem, Donald;Andino, Raul;DeRisi, Joseph L.

Description

Honey bees (Apis mellifera) play a critical role in global food production as pollinators of numerous crops. Recently, honey bee populations in the United States, Canada, and Europe have suffered an unexplained increase in annual losses due to a phenomenon known as Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD). Epidemiological analysis of CCD is confounded by a relative dearth of bee pathogen field studies. To identify what constitutes an abnormal pathophysiological condition in a honey bee colony, it is critical to have characterized the spectrum of exogenous infectious agents in healthy hives over time. We conducted a prospective study of a large scale migratory bee keeping operation using high-frequency sampling paired with comprehensive molecular detection methods, including a custom microarray, qPCR, and ultra deep sequencing. We established seasonal incidence and abundance of known viruses, Nosema sp., Crithidia mellificae, and bacteria. Ultra deep sequence analysis further identified four novel RNA viruses, two of which were the most abundant observed components of the honey bee microbiome (∼10(11) viruses per honey bee). Our results demonstrate episodic viral incidence and distinct pathogen patterns between summer and winter time-points. Peak infection of common honey bee viruses and Nosema occurred in the summer, whereas levels of the trypanosomatid Crithidia mellificae and Lake Sinai virus 2, a novel virus, peaked in January.

Citations (1)

Mentions (0)

Metrics

Dataset Index

2.0

FAIR Score

69%

Citations

1

Mentions

0

Metrics Over Time

Publication Details

DOI

Publisher

Dryad

Assigned Domain

Subfield

Insect Science

Field

Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Domain

Life Sciences

Confidence Score

49%

Source

Scholar Data Model

Normalization Factors

FT

13.46

CTw

1.00

MTw

1.00