<b>Supporting material: Clinician and patient perspectives on implementation of a remote interpretation model of cutaneous confocal microscopy for skin cancer diagnosis: a qualitative study using an acceptability framework</b>

View Dataset
Ho, Genevieve;Smith, Andrea L;Collgros-Totosaus, Helena;Sinz, Christoph;Melhoranse-Gouveia, Bruna;Gallo, Bruna;Chew, Christopher Y.;Huang, Cheng;Harris, Ucalene;Jain, Manu;Ip, Ken;koutsis, james;Schwartz-Aldea, Rodrigo;Herbert Chan, Hsien;Gribbin, Hannah Grace;Harvey, Rhonda A;Mar, Victoria J.;Soyer, H. Peter;Martin, Linda K;Cust, Anne E.;Guitera, Pascale

Description

Remote interpretation of reflectance confocal microscopy is an innovative and acceptable means to increase access to the non-invasive diagnostic technology.Implementation is largely reliant on individual clinicians’ attitudes toward new technology and innovative models of care.Clinicians’ acceptability of implementation was influenced by the ability of remote-RCM to generate meaningful data for remote interpretation, technological connectivity, cultural and infrastructure supports, and individual capabilities and motivation

Citations (0)

Mentions (0)

Metrics

Dataset Index

0.1

FAIR Score

15%

Citations

0

Mentions

0

Metrics Over Time

Publication Details

DOI

Publisher

figshare

License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Assigned Domain

Subfield

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Field

Medicine

Domain

Health Sciences

Confidence Score

45%

Source

Scholar Data Model

Keywords

DermatologyCancer diagnosis

Normalization Factors

FT

63.46

CTw

1.00

MTw

1.00