Additional file 10: of Comprehensive assessment of multiple biases in small RNA sequencing reveals significant differences in the performance of widely used methods
Wright, Carrie;Anandita Rajpurohit;Burke, Emily;Williams, Courtney;Collado-Torres, Leonardo;Kimos, Martha;Brandon, Nicholas;Cross, Alan;Jaffe, Andrew;Weinberger, Daniel;Shin, Joo
Description
Table S7. Pairwise differences between methods for miRNA detection inconsistency estimates. Percent difference is calculated as the percent difference of the first method in the comparison relative to the second, thus Clontech had 61% more inconsistency than Illumina. Percent difference was calculated using more precise means than the rounded means shown in the table. Significant findings are highlighted in yellow. (XLSX 40 kb)
Citations (0)
No citations found
It looks like this dataset has no citations.
Mentions (0)
No mentions found
It looks like this dataset has not been mentioned in any sources.
Metrics Over Time
Publication Details
DOI
Publisher
figshare
Subfield
Social Psychology
Field
Psychology
Domain
Social Sciences
Confidence Score
39%
Source
Scholar Data Model
Keywords
BiophysicsBiochemistryMedicineMolecular Biology69999 Biological Sciences not elsewhere classifiedFOS: Biological sciences110309 Infectious DiseasesFOS: Health sciences