Additional file 10: of Comprehensive assessment of multiple biases in small RNA sequencing reveals significant differences in the performance of widely used methods

Wright, Carrie;Anandita Rajpurohit;Burke, Emily;Williams, Courtney;Collado-Torres, Leonardo;Kimos, Martha;Brandon, Nicholas;Cross, Alan;Jaffe, Andrew;Weinberger, Daniel;Shin, Joo

Description

Table S7. Pairwise differences between methods for miRNA detection inconsistency estimates. Percent difference is calculated as the percent difference of the first method in the comparison relative to the second, thus Clontech had 61% more inconsistency than Illumina. Percent difference was calculated using more precise means than the rounded means shown in the table. Significant findings are highlighted in yellow. (XLSX 40 kb)

Citations (0)

Mentions (0)

Metrics

Dataset Index

0.8

FAIR Score

85%

Citations

1

Mentions

0

Metrics Over Time

Publication Details

DOI

Publisher

figshare

License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Assigned Domain

Subfield

Social Psychology

Field

Psychology

Domain

Social Sciences

Confidence Score

39%

Source

Scholar Data Model

Keywords

BiophysicsBiochemistryMedicineMolecular Biology69999 Biological Sciences not elsewhere classifiedFOS: Biological sciences110309 Infectious DiseasesFOS: Health sciences

Normalization Factors

FT

59.62

CTw

1.00

MTw

1.00