Description
Empirical Activations DatasetRaw activation data from the empirical validation of the GCA/HC framework.Companion report: Empirical Validation of the GCA/HC Framework (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18734207)Theoretical paper: The LLM Naming Problem (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17221959)Experiment toolkit: G.H.O.S.T.## Models| Model | Layers | Hidden dim | Architecture ||-------|--------|------------|-------------|| Gemma 2 27B | 46 | 4608 | Google DeepMind || Qwen 3 32B | 64 | 5120 | Alibaba || Llama 3.3 70B | 80 | 8192 | Meta |## Dataset structure01-empirical-activations/├── t1_t3_multiturn/ §5 Multi-turn drift (Gemma) 11 MB├── t2_phase_transitions/ §4 Phase transitions (Gemma) 363 MB├── directional_null/ §6.6-7 Directional comparison (3 mod) 1.3 GB├── pairwise/ §7.8 Pairwise interference (Qwen) 384 MB├── pairwise_dense/ §7.8 Dense pairwise (Qwen, extended) 1.8 GB└── weight_probe/ §7.8 Weight-space probes (Qwen) 1.4 GBTotal: ~5.2 GB, ~16,600 files.Each subdirectory contains a README with details on the experiment, file format, and the relevant report sections.## MethodologyAll activation data was generated using the assistant axis vectors from Lu et al. (arXiv:2601.10387). The core technique is partial projection removal:h <- h - alpha * <h, a_hat> * a_hatwhere h is the hidden state, a_hat is the unit assistant axis, and alpha controls ablation strength (0 = no intervention, 1 = full removal).## File formatAll .npy files are NumPy arrays saved with numpy.save(). Load with:pythonimport numpy as npdata = np.load("filename.npy")## LicenseCC BY 4.0
Citations (0)
No citations found
It looks like this dataset has no citations.
Mentions (0)
No mentions found
It looks like this dataset has not been mentioned in any sources.
Metrics Over Time
Publication Details
Subfield
Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
Field
Materials Science
Domain
Physical Sciences
Confidence Score
31%
Source
Scholar Data Model