Empirical Validation of the GCA/HC Framework — Activation Dataset

View Dataset
GCAHC9000

Description

Empirical Activations DatasetRaw activation data from the empirical validation of the GCA/HC framework.Companion report: Empirical Validation of the GCA/HC Framework (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18734207)Theoretical paper: The LLM Naming Problem (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17221959)Experiment toolkit: G.H.O.S.T.## Models| Model | Layers | Hidden dim | Architecture ||-------|--------|------------|-------------|| Gemma 2 27B | 46 | 4608 | Google DeepMind || Qwen 3 32B | 64 | 5120 | Alibaba || Llama 3.3 70B | 80 | 8192 | Meta |## Dataset structure01-empirical-activations/├── t1_t3_multiturn/           §5      Multi-turn drift (Gemma)         11 MB├── t2_phase_transitions/      §4      Phase transitions (Gemma)       363 MB├── directional_null/          §6.6-7  Directional comparison (3 mod)  1.3 GB├── pairwise/                  §7.8    Pairwise interference (Qwen)    384 MB├── pairwise_dense/            §7.8    Dense pairwise (Qwen, extended) 1.8 GB└── weight_probe/              §7.8    Weight-space probes (Qwen)      1.4 GBTotal: ~5.2 GB, ~16,600 files.Each subdirectory contains a README with details on the experiment, file format, and the relevant report sections.## MethodologyAll activation data was generated using the assistant axis vectors from Lu et al. (arXiv:2601.10387). The core technique is partial projection removal:h <- h - alpha * <h, a_hat> * a_hatwhere h is the hidden state, a_hat is the unit assistant axis, and alpha controls ablation strength (0 = no intervention, 1 = full removal).## File formatAll .npy files are NumPy arrays saved with numpy.save(). Load with:pythonimport numpy as npdata = np.load("filename.npy")## LicenseCC BY 4.0

Citations (0)

Mentions (0)

Metrics

Dataset Index

0.5

FAIR Score

85%

Citations

0

Mentions

0

Metrics Over Time

Publication Details

DOI

Publisher

Zenodo

License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Assigned Domain

Subfield

Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials

Field

Materials Science

Domain

Physical Sciences

Confidence Score

31%

Source

Scholar Data Model

Normalization Factors

FT

51.92

CTw

1.00

MTw

1.00