In silico analysis of potential SARS-CoV-2 main protease inhibitors Nelfinavir and Epribuicin
View DatasetDescription
Inhibiting the main proteasome of severe acute respiratory syndrome–coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) may serve as a treatment option for patients suffering from COVID-19. Inhibition of the main proteasome (SARS-CoV-2 Mpro) may improve patient outcomes and recovery through blocking viral replication and assembly. A literature review of potential drug treatments for COVID-19 included Nelfinavir, an HIV antiviral, and Epirubicin, an anthracycline and topoisomerase inhibitor. The mechanism of action for both drugs includes binding to SARS-CoV-2 Mpro. These data highlight in-silico binding pose energy predictions of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro (receptor) each of the two drug targets (ligands) using a Generic Evolutionary Method for Molecular Docking (iGEMDOCK). In-silico screening provides highly accurate, reproducible complex-ligand binding affinity prediction data. These data are derived from a population size of 200 and 70 docking generation trials. The 3-D Protein Data Bank (PDB) structure of the main proteasome (SARS-CoV-2 Mpro) for this investigation was derived from the RCSB Protein Data Bank (PDB ID: 6LU7). The 3-D structures of Nelfinavir and Epirubicin were derived from the PubChem database (PubChem CIDs 64143, 41867 respectively). The 3-D structures were converted from 3D conformer SDF files to Protein Data Bank (PDB) formatting through OpenBabble. The data show Nelfinavir as outcompeting Epirubicin in binding to the main proteasome (SARS-CoV-2 Mpro). The complex formation with Nelfinavir was more energetically favorable than that with Epirubicin. The data include relevant binding site residues and energy values, in units of kcal/mol. A composite of van der Waals forces, hydrogen bonding, and electrostatic charge provide the energy values.
Citations (0)
No citations found
Mentions (0)
No mentions found
Metrics Over Time
Publication Details
Subfield
Molecular Biology
Field
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Domain
Life Sciences
Confidence Score
51%
Source
Open Alex