Sex differences in moral judgements across 67 countries
View DatasetDescription
Most of the empirical research on sex differences and cultural variations in morality has relied on within-culture analyses or small-scale cross-cultural data. To further broaden the scientific understanding of sex differences in morality, the current research relies on two international samples to provide the first large-scale examination of sex differences in moral judgements nested within cultures. Using a sample from 67 countries (Study 1; n = 336,691), we found culturally-variable sex differences in moral judgements, as conceptualized by Moral Foundations Theory. Women consistently scored higher than men on Care, Fairness, and Purity. In contrast, sex differences in Loyalty and Authority were negligible and highly variable across cultures. Country-level sex differences in moral judgements were also examined in relation to cultural, socio-economic, and gender-equality indicators revealing that sex differences in moral judgements are larger in individualist, Western, and gender-equal societies. In Study 2 (19 countries; n = 11,969), these results were largely replicated using Bayesian multi-level modeling in a distinct sample. The findings were robust even when incorporating cultural non-independence of countries into the models. Specifically, women consistently showed higher concerns for Care, Fairness, and Purity in their moral judgements than did men. Sex differences in moral judgements were larger in individualist and gender-equal societies with more flexible social norms. We discuss the implications of these findings for the ongoing debate about the origin of sex differences and cultural variations in moral judgements as well as theoretical and pragmatic implications for moral and evolutionary psychology.
Citations (2)
- https://doi.org/10.2174/18743501-v16-e230815-2022-88DataCite OpenAlex
Cited on 18 August 2023
Weight: 1.46
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.1201DataCite MDC OpenAlex
Cited on 21 October 2020
Weight: 1.00
Mentions (0)
No mentions found
Metrics Over Time
Publication Details
Subfield
Social Psychology
Field
Psychology
Domain
Social Sciences
Confidence Score
63%
Source
Scholar Data Model