Published on 01 January 2020 |

Version 1.0

Replication Data for: A Paradox of Political Reform: Shadow Interests in the U.S. States

View Dataset
Strickland, James

Description

Laws that restrict and disclose the actions of lobbyists are attempts to protect elected officials from undue influence and preserve public trust in lawmaking processes. Imposing too many campaign finance restrictions and reporting requirements on registered interest groups, however, might discourage them from registering. I use an original data set compiled from several decades of lobbyist lists to determine whether these laws suppress registration rates among interest groups. More limits on campaign finance activities, but not heavier reporting burdens, are shown to be associated with depressed registration of interest groups. As unregistered interests are not subject to these regulations, this presents a paradox of political reform. Reformers can either restrict the campaign finance activities of organized interests or disclose their lobbying activities more fully, but not both. I provide estimated totals of registered interest groups given a set of laws that maximizes compliance.

Citations (1)

Mentions (0)

Metrics

Dataset Index

0.7

FAIR Score

15%

Citations

1

Mentions

0

Metrics Over Time

Publication Details

DOI

Publisher

Harvard Dataverse

Assigned Domain

Subfield

Political Science and International Relations

Field

Social Sciences

Domain

Social Sciences

Confidence Score

62%

Source

Open Alex

Keywords

LawFOS: LawSocial SciencesLobbyists; ethics; transparency

Normalization Factors

FT

13.46

CTw

1.00

MTw

1.00