Published on 01 January 2020 |
Replication Data for: A Paradox of Political Reform: Shadow Interests in the U.S. States
View DatasetDescription
Laws that restrict and disclose the actions of lobbyists are attempts to protect elected officials from undue influence and preserve public trust in lawmaking processes. Imposing too many campaign finance restrictions and reporting requirements on registered interest groups, however, might discourage them from registering. I use an original data set compiled from several decades of lobbyist lists to determine whether these laws suppress registration rates among interest groups. More limits on campaign finance activities, but not heavier reporting burdens, are shown to be associated with depressed registration of interest groups. As unregistered interests are not subject to these regulations, this presents a paradox of political reform. Reformers can either restrict the campaign finance activities of organized interests or disclose their lobbying activities more fully, but not both. I provide estimated totals of registered interest groups given a set of laws that maximizes compliance.
Citations (1)
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x18788049DataCite MDC
Cited on 31 July 2018
Weight: 1.00
Mentions (0)
No mentions found
Metrics Over Time
Publication Details
Subfield
Political Science and International Relations
Field
Social Sciences
Domain
Social Sciences
Confidence Score
62%
Source
Open Alex