Published on 01 January 1987
(Table 1) Distribution of planktonic foraminifera in the Paleocene/Cretaceous section of DSDP Hole 93-605
View DatasetDescription
Analysis of planktonic foraminifers from Section 605-66-1 established the Cretaceous/Tertiary (K/T) boundary between 68 and 73 cm. Comparison with the detailed zonation established at El Kef, Tunisia, indicates that some of the section may be missing, probably because of drilling disturbance. The preservation of the planktonic foraminifers is generally good, particularly in the basal Paleocene section. However, extensive dissolution and the many broken specimens render quantitative estimates unreliable. There were no microtektite-like spherules to suggest a layer rich in extraterrestrial components, as have been found in most complete pelagic K/T boundary sections. The better preservation of Paleocene foraminiferal test in this core and in many other DSDP cores from other basins is probably due to a change in oceanic carbonate chemistry exactly at the K/T boundary. This may have been caused by a temporary and almost complete disappearance of carbonate-fixing organisms at the boundary.
Citations (31)
Cited on 01 January 2026
Weight: 1.00
- https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.dz4z59DataCite
Cited on 16 June 2020
Weight: 2.16
- https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.j3a57hDataCite
Cited on 14 May 2020
Weight: 2.16
- https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.8g5uycDataCite
Cited on 14 May 2020
Weight: 2.16
- https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.v76kf3DataCite
Cited on 14 May 2020
Weight: 2.16
- https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.y6dsbpDataCite
Cited on 14 May 2020
Weight: 2.16
- https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.ka55fkDataCite
Cited on 12 May 2020
Weight: 2.16
- https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.nrk7hmDataCite
Cited on 10 May 2020
Weight: 2.16
- https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.du9nx5DataCite
Cited on 07 May 2020
Weight: 2.16
- https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.2t4q4kDataCite
Cited on 06 May 2020
Weight: 2.16
Mentions (0)
No mentions found
Metrics Over Time
Publication Details
Subfield
Genetics
Field
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Domain
Life Sciences
Confidence Score
42%
Source
Scholar Data Model