Published on 07 July 2011 |
Data from: Data sharing by scientists: practices and perceptions
View DatasetDescription
Background: Scientific research in the 21st century is more data intensive and collaborative than in the past. It is important to study the data practices of researchers –data accessibility, discovery, re-use, preservation and, particularly, data sharing. Data sharing is a valuable part of the scientific method allowing for verification of results and extending research from prior results. Methodology/Principal Findings: A total of 1329 scientists participated in this survey exploring current data sharing practices and perceptions of the barriers and enablers of data sharing. Scientists do not make their data electronically available to others for various reasons, including insufficient time and lack of funding. Most respondents are satisfied with their current processes for the initial and short-term parts of the data or research lifecycle (collecting their research data; searching for, describing or cataloging, analyzing, and short-term storage of their data) but are not satisfied with long-term data preservation. Many organizations do not provide support to their researchers for data management both in the short- and long-term. If certain conditions are met (such as formal citation and sharing reprints) respondents agree they are willing to share their data. There are also significant differences and approaches in data management practices based on primary funding agency, subject discipline, age, work focus, and world region. Conclusions/Significance: Barriers to effective data sharing and preservation are deeply rooted in the practices and culture of the research process as well as the researchers themselves. New mandates for data management plans from NSF and other federal agencies and world-wide attention to the need to share and preserve data could lead to changes. Large scale programs, such as the NSF-sponsored DataNET (including projects like DataONE) will both bring attention and resources to the issue and make it easier for scientists to apply sound data management principles.
Citations (3)
Cited on 27 December 2017
Weight: 1.64
- https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9390MDC OpenAlex
Cited on 31 May 2016
Weight: 1.59
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021101DataCite MDC
Cited on 29 June 2011
Weight: 1.00
Mentions (1)
- https://github.com/olendorf/scientist_surveysSoftware Heritage
Mentioned on 08 September 2024
Weight: 1.87
Metrics Over Time
Publication Details
Subfield
Information Systems
Field
Computer Science
Domain
Physical Sciences
Confidence Score
66%
Source
Scholar Data Model