Data from: Accuracy of genomic selection models in a large population of open-pollinated families in white spruce
View DatasetDescription
Genomic selection (GS) is of interest in breeding because of its potential for predicting the genetic value of individuals and increasing genetic gains per unit of time. To date, very few studies have reported empirical results of GS potential in the context of large population sizes and long breeding cycles such as for boreal trees. In this study, we assessed the effectiveness of marker-aided selection in an undomesticated white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) population of large effective size using a GS approach. A discovery population of 1694 trees representative of 214 open-pollinated families from 43 natural populations was phenotyped for 12 wood and growth traits and genotyped for 6385 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) mined in 2660 gene sequences. GS models were built to predict estimated breeding values using all the available SNPs or SNP subsets of the largest absolute effects, and they were validated using various cross-validation schemes. The accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) varied from 0.327 to 0.435 when the training and the validation data sets shared half-sibs that were on average 90% of the accuracies achieved through traditionally estimated breeding values. The trend was also the same for validation across sites. As expected, the accuracy of GEBVs obtained after cross-validation with individuals of unknown relatedness was lower with about half of the accuracy achieved when half-sibs were present. We showed that with the marker densities used in the current study, predictions with low to moderate accuracy could be obtained within a large undomesticated population of related individuals, potentially resulting in larger gains per unit of time with GS than with the traditional approach.
Citations (10)
Cited on 01 January 2026
Weight: 1.00
Cited on 17 September 2024
Weight: 1.79
Cited on 06 March 2021
Weight: 1.69
Cited on 11 August 2020
Weight: 1.64
Cited on 12 May 2020
Weight: 1.64
Cited on 28 February 2020
Weight: 1.64
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-019-1404-zDataCite OpenAlex
Cited on 24 December 2019
Weight: 1.59
Cited on 01 March 2017
Weight: 1.46
Cited on 01 March 2016
Weight: 1.36
- https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2014.36DataCite MDC
Cited on 30 April 2014
Weight: 1.00
Mentions (0)
No mentions found
Metrics Over Time
Publication Details
Subfield
Genetics
Field
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Domain
Life Sciences
Confidence Score
94%
Source
Open Alex