Data from: The molecular genetics of clinal variation: a case study of ebony and thoracic trident pigmentation in Drosophila melanogaster from eastern Australia
View DatasetDescription
Widespread pigmentation diversity coupled with a well-defined genetic system of melanin synthesis and patterning in Drosophila provides an excellent opportunity to study phenotypes undergoing evolutionary change. Pigmentation variation is highly correlated with different ecological variables and is thought to reflect adaptations to different environments. Several studies have linked candidate genes from D. melanogaster to intra-population variation and interspecific morphological divergence, but less clearly to variation among populations forming pigmentation clines. We characterised a new thoracic trident pigmentation cline in D. melanogaster populations from eastern Australia, and applied a candidate gene approach to explain the majority of the geographically structured phenotypic variation. More melanised populations from higher latitudes tended to express less ebony than their tropical counterparts, and an independent artificial selection experiment confirmed this association. By partitioning temperature dependent effects, we showed that the genetic differences underlying clinal patterns for trident variation at 25°C do not explain the patterns observed at 16°C. Changes in thoracic trident pigmentation could be a common evolutionary response to climatically-mediated environmental pressures. On the Australian east coast most of the changes appear to be associated with regulatory divergence of the ebony gene but this depends on temperature.
Citations (3)
Cited on 01 January 2026
Weight: 1.00
- https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2015.67MDC OpenAlex
Cited on 24 November 2015
Weight: 1.53
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2011.05089.xDataCite MDC
Cited on 01 May 2011
Weight: 1.00
Mentions (0)
No mentions found
Metrics Over Time
Publication Details
Subfield
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Field
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Domain
Life Sciences
Confidence Score
73%
Source
Open Alex