Site is currently under maintenance
Some features may be unavailable or limited during this time. We apologize for any inconvenience and appreciate your patience.

Published on 01 January 2021

Supplementary Material: Expanded carrier in screening in Flanders (Belgium): an online survey on the perspectives of non-pregnant reproductive-aged women

View Dataset
E, Van Steijvoort;H, Devolder;I, Geysen;S, Van Epperzeel;H, Peeters;K, Peeraer;G, Matthijs;P, Borry

Description

Abstract

Background: Despite a considerable interest in expanded carrier screening (ECS) in the general population, actual uptake of ECS remains low. More insights are needed to better understand the perspectives of reproductive-aged individuals.

Materials and methods: Non-pregnant women of reproductive age recruited through public pharmacies throughout Flanders (Belgium) were invited to participate in an online survey.

Results: Most participants (63.6%) indicated they would consider ECS for themselves in the future. About 1 in 2 participants showed a positive attitude towards ECS.

Conclusion: This study reports valuable insights in the perspectives of non-pregnant reproductive aged women in Flanders (Belgium) regarding ECS that can be used in the on-going debate on the responsible implementation of ECS.



Text A: Background information



Text B: Questionnaire



Text C Supplementary data:

Table 8: Sociodemographic Characteristics of participants

Table 9: Perceived susceptibility

Table 10: Acceptability & intention to participate in ECS

Table 11: Knowledge about ECS related concepts

Table 12: Attitudes towards ECS

Table 13: Preferences for the practical organization of a population-based ECS offer

Citations (1)

Mentions (0)

Metrics

Dataset Index

0.7

FAIR Score

13%

Citations

1

Mentions

0

Metrics Over Time

Publication Details

DOI

Publisher

Taylor & Francis

Assigned Domain

Subfield

Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Field

Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Domain

Life Sciences

Confidence Score

35%

Source

Scholar Data Model

Normalization Factors

FT

13.46

CTw

1.00

MTw

1.00