OverviewThis dataset contains dataset metadata, FAIR scores, citations, mentions, and research field data collected/generated during our real world testing and validation of the S-index. The analysis of this dataset was included in our NIH S-index Challenge Phase 2 proposal. The code used to collect this data and additional details about the data collection methods and data structure are available in the related GitHub repository. We refer to the S-index Hub for more information about our S-index, the Challenge, and other related resources. DetailsAll data files are in NDJSON format. Data was collected between October 2025 and January 2026. A DuckDB file combining this data is available here.FolderDescriptionmetadataContains reduced metadata of 49M+ datasets from the Datacite database and 51k+ datasets from the Electron Microscopy Data Bank (EMDB). Includes all datasets registered/published on or before September 30th, 2025. Data is in NDSON format following the DataCite Metadata Schema.fair_scoresContains FAIR scores of all the datasets calculated using F-UJI (between October 2025 and January 2026). citationsContains 7.7M + unique citations to our datasets collected from the Make Data Count Data Citation Corpus, OpenAlex, and DataCite. mentionsContains 91k+ mentions to our datasets collected from the README files of GitHub repositories using Software Data, Model Cards of AI/ML models on Hugging Face, and patents from the USPTO. research_fieldsContains research fields assigned to our datasets following the OpenAlex Topics taxonomy. Fields assigment comes from OpenAlex and a custom classifier we developed.

OverviewThis dataset contains the DuckDB file where we combined dataset metadata, FAIR scores, citations, mentions, and research field data collected/generated during our real world testing and validation of the S-index. It also contains computed Dataset Index and S-index. The analysis of this dataset was included in our NIH S-index Challenge Phase 2 proposal. The code used to collect this data and additional details about the data collection methods and data structure are available in the related GitHub repository. We refer to the S-index Hub for more information about our S-index, the Challenge, and other related resources.Related ItemsThe NDJSON files of dataset metadata, FAIR scores, citations, mentions, and research field available here were loaded in this DuckDB fileThe code used to compute the Dataset Index and S-index is available in the related GitHub repositoryThe code to analyze this data is available in this GitHub repository.

OverviewThis dataset contains the DuckDB file where we combined dataset metadata, FAIR scores, citations, mentions, and research field data collected/generated during our real world testing and validation of the S-index. It also contains computed Dataset Index and S-index. The analysis of this dataset was included in our NIH S-index Challenge Phase 2 proposal. The code used to collect this data and additional details about the data collection methods and data structure are available in the related GitHub repository. We refer to the S-index Hub for more information about our S-index, the Challenge, and other related resources.Related ItemsThe NDJSON files of dataset metadata, FAIR scores, citations, mentions, and research field available here were loaded in this DuckDB fileThe code used to compute the Dataset Index and S-index is available in the related GitHub repositoryThe code to analyze this data is available in this GitHub repository.

OverviewThis dataset contains dataset metadata, FAIR scores, citations, mentions, and research field data collected/generated during our real world testing and validation of the S-index. The analysis of this dataset was included in our NIH S-index Challenge Phase 2 proposal. The code used to collect this data and additional details about the data collection methods and data structure are available in the related GitHub repository. We refer to the S-index Hub for more information about our S-index, the Challenge, and other related resources. DetailsAll data files are in NDJSON format. Data was collected between October 2025 and January 2026. A DuckDB file combining this data is available here.FolderDescriptionmetadataContains reduced metadata of 49M+ datasets from the Datacite database and 51k+ datasets from the Electron Microscopy Data Bank (EMDB). Includes all datasets registered/published on or before September 30th, 2025. Data is in NDSON format following the DataCite Metadata Schema.fair_scoresContains FAIR scores of all the datasets calculated using F-UJI (between October 2025 and January 2026). citationsContains 7.7M + unique citations to our datasets collected from the Make Data Count Data Citation Corpus, OpenAlex, and DataCite. mentionsContains 91k+ mentions to our datasets collected from the README files of GitHub repositories using Software Data, Model Cards of AI/ML models on Hugging Face, and patents from the USPTO. research_fieldsContains research fields assigned to our datasets following the OpenAlex Topics taxonomy. Fields assigment comes from OpenAlex and a custom classifier we developed.

This is the dataset associated with the paper titled "Publicly Available Imaging Datasets for Age-related Macular Degeneration: Evaluation according to the Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reproducible (FAIR) Principles". Age-related macular degeneration (AMD), a leading cause of vision loss among older adults, affects more than 200 million people worldwide. In this paper, We evaluated openly available AMD-related datasets containing optical coherence tomography (OCT) data against the FAIR principles. This is an archive of the repository that contains the data related to our evaluation. See this inventory for all related resources, including the paper. This dataset is maintained from https://github.com/fairdataihub/FAIR-AMD-OCT-paper-dataset.

This is the dataset associated with the paper titled "Publicly Available Imaging Datasets for Age-related Macular Degeneration: Evaluation according to the Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reproducible (FAIR) Principles". Age-related macular degeneration (AMD), a leading cause of vision loss among older adults, affects more than 200 million people worldwide. In this paper, We evaluated openly available AMD-related datasets containing optical coherence tomography (OCT) data against the FAIR principles. This is an archive of the repository that contains the data related to our evaluation. See this inventory for all related resources, including the paper. This dataset is maintained from https://github.com/fairdataihub/FAIR-AMD-OCT-paper-dataset.

This is the dataset associated with our paper titled "Dataset Documentation for Responsible AI: Analysis of Suitability and Usage for Health Datasets". Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming healthcare, but also raising concerns about algorithmic biases that mostly stem from the training data. It is widely supported that transparent dataset documentation is key to enabling responsible AI development. Several standardized dataset documentation approaches have been established, such as Datasheet, Dataset Nutrition Label, Accountability Documentation, Healthsheet, and Data Card. However, their suitability and usage for health datasets remain unclear. In this paper, we compared all five approaches and evaluated their alignment with the STANDING Together Recommendations for Documentation of Health Datasets. We also investigated their real-world usage and gathered insights from generators and consumers of health datasets.The paper will be linked here when published: https://github.com/AI-READI/dataset-documentation-paper-inventory

This is the dataset associated with our paper titled "Dataset Documentation for Responsible AI: Analysis of Suitability and Usage for Health Datasets". Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming healthcare, but also raising concerns about algorithmic biases that mostly stem from the training data. It is widely supported that transparent dataset documentation is key to enabling responsible AI development. Several standardized dataset documentation approaches have been established, such as Datasheet, Dataset Nutrition Label, Accountability Documentation, Healthsheet, and Data Card. However, their suitability and usage for health datasets remain unclear. In this paper, we compared all five approaches and evaluated their alignment with the STANDING Together Recommendations for Documentation of Health Datasets. We also investigated their real-world usage and gathered insights from generators and consumers of health datasets.The paper will be linked here when published: https://github.com/AI-READI/dataset-documentation-paper-inventory

Dataset associated with the paper titled "Pressure-flow relation of porcine thoracic duct segment". See here for details: https://github.com/bvhpatel/TD-pressure-flow-paper-inventory.

Dataset associated with the paper titled "Pressure-flow relation of porcine thoracic duct segment". See here for details: https://github.com/bvhpatel/TD-pressure-flow-paper-inventory.