Automated Author ProfileSoyer, H. Peter
Soyer, H. Peter
Current S-Index
Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets
Average Dataset Index per Dataset
Average Dataset Index per dataset
Total Datasets
Total datasets for this author
Average FAIR Score
Average FAIR Score per dataset
Total Citations
Total citations to the author's datasets
Total Mentions
Total mentions of the author's datasets
S-Index Interpretation
The S-Index (Sharing Index) is a comprehensive metric that represents the cumulative impact of all your datasets. It is calculated as the sum of Dataset Index scores across all your claimed datasets.
What it means:
- A higher S-index indicates greater overall impact of your datasets relative to typical datasets in their fields of research
- The S-Index grows as you add more datasets or as existing datasets gain more citations and mentions
- It provides a single number to track your research data impact over time
Current S-Index: 1.5 (sum of 5 datasets Dataset Index scores)
More information here.
S-Index Over Time
Cumulative Citations Over Time
Cumulative Mentions Over Time
Datasets
Remote interpretation of reflectance confocal microscopy is an innovative and acceptable means to increase access to the non-invasive diagnostic technology.Implementation is largely reliant on individual clinicians’ attitudes toward new technology and innovative models of care.Clinicians’ acceptability of implementation was influenced by the ability of remote-RCM to generate meaningful data for remote interpretation, technological connectivity, cultural and infrastructure supports, and individual capabilities and motivation
Authors
- Ho, Genevieve ;
- Smith, Andrea L ;
- Collgros-Totosaus, Helena ;
- Sinz, Christoph ;
- Melhoranse-Gouveia, Bruna ;
- Gallo, Bruna ;
- Chew, Christopher Y. ;
- Huang, Cheng ;
- Harris, Ucalene ;
- Jain, Manu ;
- Ip, Ken ;
- koutsis, james ;
- Schwartz-Aldea, Rodrigo ;
- Herbert Chan, Hsien ;
- Gribbin, Hannah Grace ;
- Harvey, Rhonda A ;
- Mar, Victoria J. ;
- Soyer, H. Peter ;
- Martin, Linda K ;
- Cust, Anne E. ;
- Guitera, Pascale
Remote interpretation of reflectance confocal microscopy is an innovative and acceptable means to increase access to the non-invasive diagnostic technology.Implementation is largely reliant on individual clinicians’ attitudes toward new technology and innovative models of care.Clinicians’ acceptability of implementation was influenced by the ability of remote-RCM to generate meaningful data for remote interpretation, technological connectivity, cultural and infrastructure supports, and individual capabilities and motivation
Authors
- Ho, Genevieve ;
- Smith, Andrea L ;
- Collgros-Totosaus, Helena ;
- Sinz, Christoph ;
- Melhoranse-Gouveia, Bruna ;
- Gallo, Bruna ;
- Chew, Christopher Y. ;
- Huang, Cheng ;
- Harris, Ucalene ;
- Jain, Manu ;
- Ip, Ken ;
- koutsis, james ;
- Schwartz-Aldea, Rodrigo ;
- Herbert Chan, Hsien ;
- Gribbin, Hannah Grace ;
- Harvey, Rhonda A ;
- Mar, Victoria J. ;
- Soyer, H. Peter ;
- Martin, Linda K ;
- Cust, Anne E. ;
- Guitera, Pascale
No description available
Authors
- Hames, Samuel C. ;
- Ardigò, Marco ;
- Soyer, H. Peter ;
- Bradley, Andrew P. ;
- Prow, Tarl W.
No description available
Authors
- Hames, Samuel C. ;
- Ardigò, Marco ;
- Soyer, H. Peter ;
- Bradley, Andrew P. ;
- Prow, Tarl W.